<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSM journalism and Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediamum.net/2008/09/24/msm-journalism-and-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2008/09/24/msm-journalism-and-twitter/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Aussie for Mom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenyum/Tacomamama</title>
		<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2008/09/24/msm-journalism-and-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenyum/Tacomamama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamum.wordpress.com/?p=109#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I think you raise a really good point about Twitter.  CNN is doing a pretty good job with it, for example, with Rich Sanchez and Issue #1.  Sanchez actually shows their @replies (selectively) and responds, making it clear that it isn&#039;t (just) an advertising gimmick.  Twitter has the potential to be an off-site place to elicit reader comments, in a way that will not damage a brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you raise a really good point about Twitter.  CNN is doing a pretty good job with it, for example, with Rich Sanchez and Issue #1.  Sanchez actually shows their @replies (selectively) and responds, making it clear that it isn&#8217;t (just) an advertising gimmick.  Twitter has the potential to be an off-site place to elicit reader comments, in a way that will not damage a brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

