You are here: Home // Home & Family, Media Matters // Were the Christmas miracle mother and baby "saved" from epidural?

Were the Christmas miracle mother and baby "saved" from epidural?

Ah the miracle of medicine, look how much you’ve done for women and babies. Birthing in the Western World is no longer fraught with danger, thanks to your hand.

Or is it?

Image: renjith krishnan / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The oh-so convenient Christmas miracle story splashed internationally across mass media headlines of a Coloradan woman and her baby dying through childbirth and then “inexplicably” being revived held readers spellbound. It was the perfect gift for editors – as a front page, it sold papers.

But media did not report the facts – they just told a good story.

In birth, medicine has moved beyond monitoring women and fixing stuff that goes wrong to getting in there and making birth a “medical procedure.” Whether a woman is likely to birth successfully without intervention or not is not considered when offering everything from epidurals to c-sections to “patients” who are armed with the gift of choice, but not the gift of a full education about the side-effects each of these interventions carry.

Do they know that as soon as you introduce one intervention, the likelihood of more being required is exponentially higher? Epidurals lead, often, to more intervention. Why? Because blind freddy can tell that if you can’t feel your body, if you muck around with its ability to do the work it was naturally trying to do, then it’s going to be more likely to repay you in kind. Epidurals are not headache tablets for birthing. Too many women believe they are. Too many women give their birthing up to medicine with no reasonable or rational cause. They’re missing out on the most powerful experience of their lives – and often recovering from major abdominal surgery. Society is also paying through the nose for these unnecessary surgeries. Over 30% of American women now have c-sections. Before long it will be the “normal” way to birth.

Media did not question the fact that Tracy and Mike Hermanstorfer were being “prepped for childbirth” in a medicalized setting with pitocin delivered and an epidural being inserted, and that apparently coincidentally Tracy’s heart stopped after the epidural. (There is real research into the side-effects of epidurals… this link to the American Pregnancy Association states more than 50% of American women have epidurals – but if you read to the end, the very real possibility of cascades of intervention and medical trauma directly related to the epidural, including severely lowering heart rates of both mother and baby are basically outlined. And that’s if they put it in correctly.)

Henci Goer reported on this story yesterday, for Lamaze International. She outlines the details of potential medical responsibility in the trauma endured by this family. Additionally, in ABC News’s video interview with the doctor and Hermanstorfers, the cascade of intervention is described – but the reporting does absolutely nothing to question further about those interventions.

Traditional media are failing us in reporting on birth. We are so accepting of medicalised birth that media do not question medical responsibility in this family’s trauma. Instead, it celebrates the “Christmas miracle” that sells its papers – and the UK’s Daily Mail even went so far as to credit the doctor for bringing back lifeless Tracy. Again, the business model gets in the way of good journalism. Find the quickest story that sells the paper and pulls a heartstring, not the story that takes research and investigation.

I know many religious people have already adopted this story, calling it God’s hand at work. Others will say “thank goodness she was in a hospital (where our human-made gods are) – what would have happened if she were at home?”

What indeed.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to " Were the Christmas miracle mother and baby "saved" from epidural? "

  1. [...] This post was Twitted by Blacktating [...]

  2. Kiki says:

    Great post. My thoughts, EXACTLY. I couldn’t help but be skeptical when I initially read this story (I just ranted about it on my blog yesterday!). While it is wonderful that no one actually died, I can’t help but wonder what the world is thinking…can’t anyone put 2 & 2 together to see that had she not had the interventions in the first place, she wouldn’t have died and come back to life?

    But you are right: women are taught to believe that the allmighty epidural is a headache pill cure (or however you said it, brilliant!) with zero side effects. Death than being alive is clearly one such side affect (or is it effect…I am so bad at those 2 words!). And if women keep believing that giving birth is the equivalent of buying a goldfish, what’s going to change? Who’s going to sign up for au natural homebirth (besides me!)???

    Ahhhh!!!!!! Insanity……

  3. chris says:

    thank you for this real story… Im versed in the bradley method of natural childbirth, and I was searching frantically for someone who thought the same thing as me… it was a direct result of the epidural. He more than likely inserted the needle too far, giving her a much stronger dose directly into the spinal column. The only miracle here is if this woman doesnt sue for malpractice…

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge

Copyright © Mediamum. All rights reserved.
Based on design by Theme Junkie. Powered by WordPress.