<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who owns a Twitter hashtag?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediamum.net/2010/03/01/who-owns-a-twitter-hashtag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2010/03/01/who-owns-a-twitter-hashtag/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Aussie for Mom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediamum</title>
		<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2010/03/01/who-owns-a-twitter-hashtag/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>mediamum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediamum.net/?p=675#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>Hi Michele, thanks for visiting. Yes, absolutely there are regular chat sessions that are identifiable using a hashtag - and as you say, the community support is what makes it stick to the topic. The point of this post (written over a year ago, but still relevant) is that while some brands might want to come into twitter and &#039;buy&#039; a hashtag (you&#039;d be shocked how often this comes to me as a question), that&#039;s not how it works. As you recognise, the community needs to support the tag and its use for it to remain, and while that community would self-manage the tag if they were in favour of it, they would also ignore it or even purposely mis-use it if they disagreed with the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michele, thanks for visiting. Yes, absolutely there are regular chat sessions that are identifiable using a hashtag &#8211; and as you say, the community support is what makes it stick to the topic. The point of this post (written over a year ago, but still relevant) is that while some brands might want to come into twitter and &#8216;buy&#8217; a hashtag (you&#8217;d be shocked how often this comes to me as a question), that&#8217;s not how it works. As you recognise, the community needs to support the tag and its use for it to remain, and while that community would self-manage the tag if they were in favour of it, they would also ignore it or even purposely mis-use it if they disagreed with the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Price</title>
		<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2010/03/01/who-owns-a-twitter-hashtag/comment-page-1/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 17:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediamum.net/?p=675#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>While you are correct on one owns a hashtag, you will find the community that has a conversation around a specific hashtag will bring you back into line.  

For example many hashtags are for weekly chats/conversations around specific topics like #blogchat #Speakchat and #HFChat.  If someone tried to misuse this hashtag the community would be really quick to point out it is not how they talk there.

So it is not a controlled message in the typical sense, yet the folks who participate will self correct folks who misuse the goodwill there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you are correct on one owns a hashtag, you will find the community that has a conversation around a specific hashtag will bring you back into line.  </p>
<p>For example many hashtags are for weekly chats/conversations around specific topics like #blogchat #Speakchat and #HFChat.  If someone tried to misuse this hashtag the community would be really quick to point out it is not how they talk there.</p>
<p>So it is not a controlled message in the typical sense, yet the folks who participate will self correct folks who misuse the goodwill there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Herbert Pruett</title>
		<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2010/03/01/who-owns-a-twitter-hashtag/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Herbert Pruett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediamum.net/?p=675#comment-296</guid>
		<description>Twitter is a telephone,
Twitter is a tweet,
Keep on usin&#039; Twitter
And you will get a treet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is a telephone,<br />
Twitter is a tweet,<br />
Keep on usin&#8217; Twitter<br />
And you will get a treet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim/hormone-colored days</title>
		<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2010/03/01/who-owns-a-twitter-hashtag/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>kim/hormone-colored days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediamum.net/?p=675#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Well put!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediamum</title>
		<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2010/03/01/who-owns-a-twitter-hashtag/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>mediamum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediamum.net/?p=675#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Yep - there&#039;s no coincidence this post came directly from some work I was doing today on exactly that. :) Funny how you made the direct connection (or is it?)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep &#8211; there&#8217;s no coincidence this post came directly from some work I was doing today on exactly that. <img src='http://www.mediamum.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Funny how you made the direct connection (or is it?)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boston Mamas</title>
		<link>http://www.mediamum.net/2010/03/01/who-owns-a-twitter-hashtag/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston Mamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediamum.net/?p=675#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Indeed. And what happened with the Nestle family hashtag is a dramatic example of how things can escalate in an uncontrolled hurry. -Christine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. And what happened with the Nestle family hashtag is a dramatic example of how things can escalate in an uncontrolled hurry. -Christine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

